About
About CHIP50
Learn about the project →
People
Meet the consortium →
Learning
Hands-on training→
Survey Methodology
View the methods→
Submit Proposals
How to submit
Learn about the submission process →
Capabilities
Goals, methodology, and proposal types →
Review process
After your proposal is submitted→
After acceptance
What to do if your proposal is accepted→
Selected proposals
View the selected successful proposals→
Social Network Competition
Special competition for social network questions→
Publications
Reports
Read all of our reports →
Publications
Read selected project papers →
Topics
Children and Youth
Explore this topic →
Economic Impact
Explore this topic →
Election
Explore this topic →
Executive Approval
Explore this topic →
Health Behavior
Explore this topic →
Mental Health
Explore this topic →
Misinformation
Explore this topic →
Policy Preferences
Explore this topic →
Schools
Explore this topic →
Testing
Explore this topic →
Vaccination
Explore this topic →
Other
Explore this topic →
Browse by Tag →
Data
Trust in Institutions
View the tracker→
Vaccination Rates
View the tracker→
Views on Abortion
View the tracker→
Executive Approval
View the tracker→
Social Media Demographics
View the tracker→
Archived Data
View →
Media Coverage
News articles
View selected media coverage →
Journalist resources
Inquiries →
InsightsKnight Partnership
Donate
Home
Submit Proposals
How to submit
Learn about the submission process →
Capabilities
Goals, methodology, and proposal types →
Review process
After your proposal is  submitted →
After acceptance
What to do if your proposal is accepted →
Social Network Competition
Special competition for social network questions →
About
About COVID States
Learn about the project →
People
Meet the consortium →
Learning
Hands on training→
Survey Methodology
View the methods →
Publications
Reports
Read all of our reports →
Publications
Read selected project papers →
Topics
Children and Youth
Explore this topic →
Economic Impact
Explore this topic →
Election
Explore this topic →
Executive Approval
Explore this topic →
Health Behavior
Explore this topic →
Mental Health
Explore this topic →
Misinformation
Explore this topic →
Policy Preferences
Explore this topic →
Schools
Explore this topic →
Testing
Explore this topic →
Vaccination
Explore this topic →
Other
Explore this topic →
Data
Trust in Institutions
View the tracker→
Vaccination Rates
View the tracker→
Views on Abortion
View the tracker→
Executive Approval
View the tracker→
Social Media Demographics
View the tracker→
Archived Data
View →
Media Coverage
News articles
View selected news coverage →
Journalist resources
Inquiries→
Insights

Report #

112

Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: Election and Personal Safety Issues

By the COVID-19 Consortium for Understanding the Public’s Policy Preferences Across States

Home
/
Publications
/
Reports
/
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: Election and Personal Safety Issues

Key takeaways

• In the presidential election, AAPI respondents across the country and across Southern states preferred Vice President Kamala Harris over former president Donald Trump, more so than the general population did: 48% of AAPI respondents in the South preferred Harris, compared to 35% from that region more generally, while 50% of AAPI respondents nationally chose Harris, versus 31% for Trump. Nationally, the general population was roughly split, with 40% for Harris and 38% for Trump.

• AAPI respondents in the South were roughly split over whether Trump handled the job well when he was last president, with 40% saying they approved to some degree, compared to 43% saying they disapproved.

• However, AAPI respondents nationally disapproved of Trump’s handling of the job by a greater degree (48% strongly disapprove or disapprove, compared to 34% strongly approve/approve.) In this survey, the general population was also split, with 42% saying they strongly approved or approved of Trump’s performance, versus 41% disapproving.

• Asked to rate parties and candidates by degree of favorability, AAPI respondents nationally were more favorable to Democrats (61 points average on a 1-100 scale) than Republicans (52 points.) Southern AAPI respondents rated Donald Trump (60 points) higher than Joe Biden (54 points), but lower than Kamala Harris (65 points.)

• Compared to the general population, slightly fewer AAPI respondents in the South and nationally reported feeling “very safe” in their home. Among the general population, 55% said they felt very safe in their home, versus 49% among Southern AAPI respondents and 48% among AAPI persons nationally.

• 48% of AAPI respondents in the South and 51% of AAPI respondents nationally said that the way U.S. politicians talk about China may contribute to stereotypes either a lot or a fair amount. 40% of the general population also believed this to be the case.

Featured media Coverage

No items found.

Tags

Election



Report details

Published:
October
2024
Report Number:
112
Topic:
Election
OSF Preprint:
View  
Download report   

Related Reports

Report #
113
November
2024
2024 US Elections: Sources of News and Information
Election

Report #
111
October
2024
Americans of Middle Eastern/North African Descent (MENA)
Election

Report #
110
October
2024
North Carolina: 2024 Election and Healthcare Issues
Election

Report #
109
October
2024
Haitian Americans: Issues in Election 2024
Election

Join our mailing list to receive updates about new reports, findings, and datasets!
Join Mailing List
A multi-university collaboration
About
About CHIP50
People
Learning
Insights
Survey Methodology
proposals
How to submit
Capabilities
Review process
After acceptance
Publications
Reports
Journal Publications
Topics
Children and Youth
Economic Impact
Election
Executive Approval
Health Behavior
Mental Health
Misinformation
Policy Preferences
Schools
Testing
Vaccination
Other
Data
Behaviors during COVID
COVID-19 Tweets
Trust in Institutions
Vaccination Rates
Views on Abortion
Media
News articles
Journalist resources

Contact us
© 2024 The Civic Health  and Institutions Project